Massachusetts Legal Developments Blog

Massachusetts Legal Developments Blog

Avoiding False Statements When Questioned by Law Enforcement

A man in the Holyoke area was arrested recently for illegally possessing machine guns as well as owning unregistered firearms and providing false statements to law enforcement.  

Several ATF and FBI were investigating a home in Holyoke when the house’s owner was taken into questioning. The man was later arrested for illegal possession of several unregistered silencers, firearms, and magazines, as well as over 40 conversion devices and forced reset triggers that are listed as machine guns under existing federal law.

Some of the forced reset triggers and conversion devices located at the man’s home include a PTR Industries firearm, an Imperial Arms Company firearm, a Sig Sauer firearm, an Intratec firearm, a Glock machine gun, and forced reset triggers manufactured by Rare Breed, Tommy Triggers.

The indictment states the man provided false statements to federal law enforcement, including that all of the firearms at the man’s residence belonged to his son and girlfriend. The man also commented that he never requested his girlfriend or son purchase firearms.

Response by the Prosecution

A U.S. attorney involved in the case stated that firearms are deadly weapons and that strict requirements exist involving the licensure and registration of firearms. In addition to unlawfully possessing unregistered firearms, the lawyer also stated that the man is believed to have had a stockpile of both conversion devices and machine guns. Weapons of this kind, the lawyer commented, threaten the safety of the community.

Advice on Avoiding False Statement Charges

Many people end up giving false information to law enforcement because they are not certain about what they can and cannot say when questioned by law enforcement. If law enforcement shows up at your house, you should remember to follow some critical advice:

  • You are not obligated to answer any question that a law enforcement officer asks, even if they have a warrant to arrest you.
  • You are not required to let law enforcement into your home unless they can show you a valid search warrant. If law enforcement states they have a search warrant, you have the constitutional right to see the warrant before letting law enforcement into your residence. Although you should cooperate if you are shown a warrant, you are still not legally obligated to give law enforcement your name. 
  • Guests in your home are also not obligated to tell law enforcement who they are. If law enforcement tries arresting this individual, however, the person might have an interest in giving law enforcement their identity to prevent wrongful arrest.
  • If you do not want to identify yourself to law enforcement, say something like “I want to remain silent” or “I’d like to remain silent until I speak to my lawyer.” After asserting this Fifth Amendment right, you are not obligated to answer anything that law enforcement asks you. 
  • If you are placed under arrest, law enforcement can bring additional charges against you if you give them a false name or other false identifiers like your date of birth, social security number, or home address. 

Obtain the Assistance of a Firearm Defense Lawyer

If you or a loved one is charged with a sex crime offense in Massachusetts, you should not hesitate to speak with an experienced attorney. Contact attorney Edward R Molrai today to schedule a free case evaluation. 

IP Addresses and Criminal Cases in Massachusetts

A man in Royalston was recently arrested after imagery involving child sex abuse was traced over the wifi of the Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The man was arrested after investigators claimed that he distributed the images over the medical center’s wifi, which can be used by the public.  

The man was charged with one count of possessing child pornography. Following arraignment, the man was held pending a detention hearing. The charging documents for the case identified the IP address of a device distributing child sex abuse content through peer-to-peer communications and decided that the device was utilizing the public wifi available at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, which is located on Main Street in Leeds. Additional surveillance determined that the man was both the owner and user of the device in question. 

A search of the suspect’s residence was later performed. A laptop, a cell phone, and an external hard drive at the residence were all determined to contain child sex abuse imagery. 

The Function of IP Addresses

Any technological equipment that accesses the internet has an Internet Protocol (IP) address. Some IP providers rely on static IP addresses that remain the same every time you connect to the internet on the device, while devices utilize dynamic IP addresses that change each time you access the internet on the device. Websites that a person visits record that individual’s IP address as well as the time of the visit. Similarly, internet service providers (ISPs) retain a log of internet activity. Even if your equipment has a dynamic IP address, the ISP holds onto a record of IP addresses assigned to you.

IP Addresses are Not Identifiable Features

Judges have routinely stated that IP addresses cannot be utilized to identify a person who has committed a criminal offense. IP addresses are not considered the same as social security numbers or physical things like fingerprints. Instead, IP addresses are better thought of like zip codes. IP addresses connect equipment to a group of people. Furthermore, people who share a hotspot often share IP addresses.

Tracking IP addresses connected with an individual over time can provide law enforcement with a detailed description of a person’s whereabouts, however. In various situations, IP addresses do not personally identify anything. For example, this is often the case when an IP address connects to dozens of computers at public locations like universities or coffee shops. In these situations, IP addresses are often best thought of as clues. 

As a result, IP addresses do not equate to probable cause that a person has committed a criminal offense. Instead, search warrants executed solely based on an IP address have a substantial likelihood of wasting a law enforcement officer’s time as well as the resources of that agency. 

Contact a Sex Crimes Defense Lawyer

If you or a loved one has been charged with a sex crime in Massachusetts, you should not hesitate to obtain the assistance of a skilled defense lawyer. Contact attorney Edward R Molari today to schedule a free case evaluation. 

Things You Should (and Should Not) Do When Interacting With Police

More than a dozen people were recently arrested in a firearm and drug seizure that occurred following investigations by two separate agencies in Springfield. Springfield police stated that over the last few weeks, investigators have performed surveillance at the High St. and School St. corridors to catch activity involving drug dealing and firearm dealing as well as prostitution. 

One man was arrested on a warrant for firearms and drug trafficking charges, while another man was arrested on a firearm warrant. A third man allegedly tried to evade the police, and a chase ensued. At one point, the man attempted to trip an officer and reached into his fanny pack. When law enforcement told him to stop, the man dropped his fanny pack and attempted to flee. A loaded gun and Massachusetts ID were later found in the fanny pack.

Trying to trip a police officer is obviously not a good idea. Interacting with law enforcement can be difficult, and these situations tend to escalate quickly. It is vital to know your rights as well as what a police officer can require of you during these encounters.

You are Allowed to Protect Yourself During a Police Encounter

The things that you say to law enforcement matter. Everything you say can be used against you later on if you face criminal charges. For this reason, you have the right to say nothing. To assert this right, you should simply tell law enforcement that you would like to remain silent.

You need not consent to a search of yourself, your vehicle, or your house. In New York City, law enforcement is required to let you know when they request your consent to a search and to inform you that you have the right to say no. If you consent to a search, it can impact your rights later in court. If law enforcement states that they have a warrant to search a premise, you should make sure to ask to see it. If law enforcement does not have a warrant, you should not consent to a search.

Avoid interfering or obstructing the police because this can lead to your arrest.

What to Do if You are Stopped by the Police

Law enforcement can stop you so long as reasonable suspicion exists that you either committed, are committing, or are about to commit a criminal offense. During this time, you should request if you are free to leave. Avoid saying anything bad about the police or attempting to run away, even if you believe what is happening is not reasonable because this could result in your arrest.

Contact a Drug Defense Attorney

Following drug arrests in Massachusetts, one of the best things that you can do is contact an experienced criminal defense attorney. Contact Attorney Edward R Molari today to schedule a free case evaluation.

Responding to Charges of Possessing a Firearm

Over a dozen men are accused of offering firearms or money in exchange for sex. These charges arise after an undercover law enforcement sting in Boston. Over the course of one night, Boston police officers posing as prostitutes caught 13 men from throughout the country who agreed to pay for sex with firearms. These men are facing charges relating to prostitution and firearm possession. A conviction on charges of firearm possession can come with serious penalties, including time in jail and hefty fines.

Three Defenses to Possession of a Firearm

If you or a loved one is charged with possession of a firearm, there are some defenses that you can raise in response. Consider some of the following ways that people defend against possession of firearm charges:

  • With the momentary possession defense, the person charged with the offense admits that they had a firearm, but that the weapon was only in their possession for a short time until they could get rid of the firearm.

  • A justifiable possession defense requires the defendant to acknowledge that they had a firearm for a justifiable reason. Defendants may claim that they took the firearm from a person who was in the act of committing a criminal offense.

  • Sometimes, a felon is charged with possessing a firearm after law enforcement locates a weapon through a property seizure. Law enforcement is only permitted to search a person or property when they have a lawful search warrant. If no warrant exists, the search must be one of the exceptions to the warrant requirement. If police confiscate a firearm during an unlawful seizure or search, the defense can use this to raise a motion to suppress evidence. Remember, the Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Contact a Firearm Defense Attorney

If you or a loved one is charged with a crime related to firearm possession in Massachusetts, you should speak with an experienced attorney. Contact Attorney Edward R Molari today to schedule a free case evaluation.

What Makes Ghost Guns So Dangerous?

Two men in Massachusetts who possessed ghost guns were sentenced to prison on drug and firearm charges in August of 2022. The men were sentenced in Providence County Superior Court to serve three years at a facility after pleading guilty to the possession of ghost guns as well as illegal drugs. The Superior Court Justice sentenced the defendants to three years of jail time followed by seven years of probation.

The Attorney General commented that guns without serial numbers have become a preferred weapon for drug dealers and violent criminals due to their untraceable nature. These guns also do not require a background check to purchase. These firearms can be easily produced from kits that can be bought cheap on the internet. 

Ghost Guns Growing More Common

Most law enforcement agencies have commented that approximately 30% or more of the firearms that are recovered after being used in crimes are privately manufactured firearms.

Privately manufactured firearms, or ghost guns, are produced outside of the regulatory framework, which means that these firearms do not have serial numbers and are not capable of being traced by law enforcement if used in a criminal offense.

To combat the use of ghost guns, law enforcement has begun to consider strategies that make it more difficult to purchase ghost guns and ammunition. For law enforcement to intervene and do something about ghost guns, they need to know that the firearms exist. Ghost guns are not always traceable, though. This makes it challenging for law enforcement to do something about these firearms.

Ghost guns are often made from kits. Elements from these guns are then created on 3D printers and lack serial numbers. Because these guns are not regulated, the guns can be acquired without undergoing a criminal background check.

No requirements exist for placing serial numbers on firearms made at someone’s residence. The guns are fairly easy to assemble. Typically, gun purchases at gun stores run from $500 to $700, while ghost guns can be purchased for around $350, making them much more accessible.

To crack down on ghost guns, the Biden administration passed a measure recently addressing ghost guns by creating a law that requires all gun kits to have serial numbers printed on gun parts that are sold online.

Contact a Firearm Defense Attorney

If you or a loved one is charged with an offense related to a ghost gun or another type of weapon, one of the best things that you can do is contact an experienced Massachusetts criminal defense attorney. Contact Attorney Edward R Molari today to schedule a free case evaluation.

SJC Rules Blood Alcohol Tests from Hospital Inadmissible in OUI Prosecutions without Defendant's Consent

The SJC ruled today that where a defendant is charged with OUI and taken to a hospital, the Commonwealth cannot use the blood alcohol tests performed there unless they were done with the consent of the person being charged. 

Frequently, police initiate an OUI investigation where a vehicle has been in an accident and the driver is injured. It is common, in such cases, for police to transport the driver to the hospital for treatment instead of taking them to the station.  When they do so, it is not possible to obtain a breathalyzer test. Police frequently note in their report that blood testing is done at the hospital, and seek to admit those testing results at trial to show the person's blood alcohol level.

This is particularly important because when police make an OUI arrest after a single car accident, there is usually very little or no evidence of the way the person was driving, other than the fact that they were in an accident.  An accident alone does not demonstrate that someone was operating negligently, nor that they were operating in a way that is indicative of intoxication.

The SJC today ruled that because G.L. c. 90, s. 24 only allows the introduciton of blood tests conducted with the consent of the defendant, the hospital records in the cases described above are inadmissible.  If the operator is placed under arrest prior to being transported to the hospital, their refusal to consent may result in a loss of license for between 180 days and lifetime, and in any case police will routinely petition for an immediate threat suspension of the license for any person involved in an accident where suspected drugs or alcohol are involved, but under the decision today, unless the person consents to the blood testing conducted at the hospital, the terms of G.L. c. 90, s. 24 preclude the introduction in evidence of the results of those tests.

See Commonwealth v. Moreau, SJC-13168 (2022)

The Differences Between Active and Open Warrants

Law enforcement recently arrested 34 individuals in a drug sweep in Brockton. The complaint came from Brockton residents and necessitated that officers go undercover. While over 40 individuals were identified, more than 34 people were arrested and now face charges related to selling drugs, open warrant violations, and trafficking drugs. Massachusetts law enforcement has commented that they are not targeting users, but are focused on working their way up by identifying drug trafficking organizations and beginning to disrupt their efforts. 

Law enforcement hopes that the bust will act as a warning to drug dealers that the Brockton police department as well as the surrounding community lack tolerance for the predatory behavior of drug dealers.

The Constitution’s Fourth Amendment guards people in the United States as well as their property against searches and seizures deemed unreasonable. The limits of the Fourth Amendment are often put to the test when active or open warrants are issued by a judge authorizing law enforcement to search a person or their property or seize this property.

Under an active warrant, law enforcement immediately searches for a person. With open warrants, law enforcement have the authority to interact with the person, but these are often the result of lower emphasis encounters.

The Role of Active Warrants

Law enforcement places great importance on active warrants. Warrants of this kind are often issued after serious criminal offenses like homicides and kidnappings. Following the commission of a serious crime, a judge issues an active warrant, which might also include an arrest, bench, or search warrant. Law enforcement will then take active measures to locate the suspect. Once located, the individual is placed under arrest and taken to jail. Sometimes, active warrants are referred to as “outstanding” warrants. 

The Role of Open Warrants

Open warrants have a low priority, and law enforcement does not actively begin to search for an individual. If a person has an open warrant, the individual cannot do things like renew their driver’s license or obtain an airline ticket. Sometimes, people are not aware they have open warrants. This might occur if a person forgets about a moving violation ticket.  

The Office of the Inspector General reports that felony warrants can remain open for an indefinite period if law enforcement lacks the resources to locate someone. Warrants are closed when a person either surrenders or a direct or physical arrest happens. Warrants are also viewed as closed if they are dismissed or a warrant is returned as the result of insufficient information. Even if a person has an open warrant in a different jurisdiction, due to the internet and today’s technology, law enforcement can quickly relay these details so they are available in the jurisdiction where you now reside. As a result, while open warrants are not emphasized as highly as active warrants, you should still make sure to address them.

Speak With a Criminal Defense Lawyer Today

Law enforcement in Massachusetts takes all crimes seriously. If you have questions about any warrants that exist for you currently, contact an attorney for help. Contact Attorney Edward R. Molari today for assistance.

What is Criminal Intent?

A Mississippi man who recently landed at Boston’s Logan International Airport for a trip to Maine was arrested after he was found loading rounds into his pistol. The state police report that the man was placed under arrest for taking his firearm out of a previously checked bag that was curbside at a terminal. Several travelers who saw the incident immediately contacted 911. The man was soon afterward placed under arrest by state law enforcement. The police stated that the man lacked any criminal intention, but selected a poor time to check on his firearm. The man was ultimately charged with possession of a firearm without a firearm identification card as well as disturbing the peace and possession of ammunition without a firearms ID. 

Criminal intent is a complex phrase about which many people charged with criminal offenses have questions. “Mens rea” is the Latin term used to refer to criminal intent, which must be established beyond a reasonable doubt for criminal offense convictions. In criminal cases, to show a defendant  is guilty, the prosecution must prove that the defendant had criminal intent to commit the crime in question. 

Offenses of a criminal nature that do not require proof of a person’s intent are referred to as “strict liability” offenses. The prosecution is not required to establish any level of criminal intent for these crimes. In most cases, criminal offenses require a culpable mental state, but some crimes can be charged despite a person’s intent.

Types of Criminal Intent

Criminal intent refers to a person’s state of mind at the time that the individual commits a criminal act. A person who makes a conscious decision to do something prohibited by law is said to have criminal intent. This means that a person is aware that their behavior is wrong and that they can be subject to punitive consequences, but the person proceeds anyway. The law mentions four types of criminal intent, which include:

  • Willful or purposeful, which involves a person who is aware of their behavior but wants to see the result of their actions

  • Knowing the results that can occur from an act, but not necessarily having the purpose to cause the consequences of the action

  • Recklessly disregarding the results of an action

  • Negligently failing to behave as a reasonable person would in such a situation and leading to others being harmed

General vs. Specific Intent

Criminal law separates criminal intent as “specific” and “general” intent. To establish specific intent is similar to establishing purposeful criminal intent. This means that a person must be shown to have intended a criminal act as well as the act’s results. Meanwhile, general intent only requires a person to have the intent to commit a criminal offense. 

Contact a Criminal Defense Attorney

Following a charge or conviction for a criminal offense in Massachusetts, people are often left uncertain about what to do. One of the best steps you can take in such a situation is to contact an experienced criminal defense lawyer. Schedule a free case evaluation with Attorney Edward R Molari today.

Four Things to Understand About Sharing Child Pornography Charges

A Swansea man was recently arrested on charges of child pornography. The man was charged with possessing pornography depicting children. Following the man’s first appearance in Boston federal court, the man was detained until his next hearing. The prosecutor on the case commented that his primary objective in pursuing this case was to see that the citizens of Massachusetts are kept safe. Additionally, the prosecutor commented that child pornography is a crime involving real victims, and that his department will dedicate its resources to protecting children. 

Law enforcement obtained information that the man had shared child pornography online through the use of a social media platform. During the police search of  the man’s home, his computer and phone were seized and were both found to contain child child pornography. The man had previously been convicted of the possession of child pornography, as well. 

Sharing child pornography is a serious offense in Massachusetts. Here are some important details about this offense.

What Type of Activity is Frequently Targeted?

One of the most common types of child pornography charges involves sharing files through peer-to-peer-based networks. People are sometimes charged with offenses even if they do not understand how these networks function. If you belong to one of these networks and have data on your computer that can be accessed by others, you can still be charged even though you might not know that someone else is engaging in taking data from your computer. 

How Sharing Child Pornography Differs From Possession

Reproducing and distributing child pornography is treated differently from possessing child pornography because it is viewed as a more serious criminal activity. Sharing this content allows more people to see it and share it again. Criminal charges related to distributing this type of data are often stricter than those associated with simply possessing this data for personal use.

How are These Cases Investigated?

Reproducing and distributing child pornography charges are investigated in a similar way as possession cases. If law enforcement believes that a person is part of a conspiracy or ring that is bigger than them, the investigation will likely occur over a longer timeframe. Law enforcement will also likely take more time to determine the size of the conspiracy.

Constitutional Issues Involved With Sharing Child Pornography

Issues involving the Fourth Amendment, which addresses illegal searches and seizures, are the most common constitutional defense that is brought up in these cases. Many times, the issue involves whether a search warrant exists to search a person or their property. If a warrant exists, situations might arise questioning whether probable cause was present. Probable cause is a legal question that often requires lengthy and evidence-heavy trials.

Contact a Sex Crimes Defense Lawyer

Sex crimes in Massachusetts carry serious penalties including potential imprisonment, fines, and a lasting tarnished reputation. One of the best things that you can do to respond to these charges is to obtain the assistance of an experienced criminal defense lawyer. Contact attorney Edward R. Molari today to schedule a free case evaluation.

Critical Questions to Ask Your Drug Crime Defense Attorney

An investigation into drug trafficking in Fall River and Taunton recently led to the arrest of seven individuals by the Massachusetts State Police. “Operation Shore Thing” also resulted in the seizure of around 1,950 grams of fentanyl, 51 grams of cocaine, 4,310 oxycodone tablets, two illegal firearms, and almost $100,000 in cash. The oxycodone and fentanyl are reported to be worth over $300,000 on the street. The District Attorney involved in the case commented that drugs involved in the seizure could tragically lead to countless fatal overdoses and that law enforcement will continue investigating drug organizations while holding those accountable for playing a role in contributing to addiction problems throughout the community.  

Law enforcement believes the group was responsible for dealing the drugs at both the street and mid-level throughout the area. Some of the charges brought against the individual include trafficking drug charges, conspiracy to violate the drug law, possession with intent to distribute, drug possession with intent to distribute, drug possession, drug distribution, firearm possession without identification, possession of a large capacity weapon, and possession with intent to distribute.

If you are facing drug charges, one of the best things that you can do is find a drug crimes defense attorney who can help you navigate this process and fight to defend your rights and freedom. Even though lawyers cannot guarantee certain results, the best drug defense attorney will provide you with knowledge and experience that make your case much easier to bear. There are some vital questions that you should make sure to ask your drug crime defense attorney.

The Lawyer’s History of Defending Against Drug Charges

After you select a potential defense attorney, you should make sure that you have full confidence in the lawyer’s ability to help you defend your case. Some questions you should ask your lawyer include:

  • How long the lawyer has been practicing

  • What is the lawyer’s experience with drug crime defense cases

  • How often the attorney works with similar cases

  • What is the end result for the lawyer’s previous cases

  • What defense strategy will work best for your case

Compensating Your Attorney

Public defenders often lack the experience necessary to help navigate drug charges successfully. If you need a defense lawyer, you should understand the costs associated with retaining a private drug lawyer to defend your case. Some questions that you should ask about the costs of hiring a defense attorney include the following: 

  • Will the attorney personally be handling your case, or another person at their firm?

  • What is the lawyer’s hourly rate or single flat fee?

  • Whether the lawyer offers payment plans or accepts credit cards

The Potential Outcome of Your Case

While your lawyer cannot promise a certain result in your case, they should be able to provide you with details that give you a realistic understanding of the potential outcome. Some of the questions addressing the outcome of your criminl case that you should make sure to ask your attorney include the following:

  • Whether you should accept a plea deal

  • What critical issues could impact your case

  • Whether alternative charges exist in your situation

  • If previous charges could influence the outcome of your case

Obtain the Help of a Drug Crime Defense Attorney

To dissuade people from using drugs, Massachusetts has established serious penalties for various drug crimes. If you or a loved one is charged with a drug-related offense, you are not alone. Contact Attorney Edward R Molari today to schedule a free case evaluation.

Pages