Massachusetts Legal Developments Blog

Massachusetts Legal Developments Blog

Criminal Court Chooses to Reverse a Decision to Dismiss Criminal Charges Against Ex-Boyfriend

Many defendants in Massachusetts face criminal charges after being accused of pestering their ex-girlfriends. These situations may be complicated further with the presence of new romantic partners. While the old saying “all’s fair in love and war” might ring true in many circles, the criminal courts are of a decidedly different opinion. These opinions, however, may fluctuate based on effective appeals from defense attorneys. This was demonstrated by a recent decision to dismiss criminal charges against an ex-boyfriend in Massachusetts. 

Why Did the Commonwealth Choose to Reverse a Decision to Dismiss a Criminal Complaint Against This Ex-Boyfriend? 

This case begins with a breakup between two adults who share a child. The ex-boyfriend later became a defendant accused of offenses related to alleged stalking. The girlfriend went on to start a new relationship with an individual who later accused the defendant of these offenses. Simply put, the victim became unsettled by the defendant’s various social media posts. The defendant also allegedly photographed the victim’s nearby vehicle after watching his child’s soccer game. 

Faced with these apparent issues, the victim went to a clerk magistrate and provided testimony. The magistrate believed that there was probable cause and issued a criminal complaint. The defendant immediately moved for a dismissal. 

A judge allowed the motion and agreed that probable cause had not been established. Perhaps most crucially, the judge did not even take into account the oral testimony that the victim had provided during the two prior show hearings. The District Attorney later wrote that this testimony should have been considered, and therefore, the decision was reversed. 

Some of the most notable details involve the nature of the social media posts made by the defendant, in which he describes the victim as a “beta male” who displays “weakness” and “cowers” behind females. He also posted what might have been interpreted as a threat: “I keep begging the universe not to push me.”

Facing these social media posts and alleged stalking, the victim and the ex-girlfriend allegedly became too afraid to leave their home – even after relocating to a new town. The defendant also claims that he suffered damage to his reputation after repeatedly being called a “child abuser” by the defendant on social media. It was alleged that the defendant made hundreds of social media posts targeting the defendant in the space of just 60 days. 

The defendant’s counsel asked the judge to consider only the victim’s application rather than any of the more detailed testimony that he had provided. Seeing limited objections from the assistant district attorney, the judge considered only the application and came to a decision quickly. In the judge’s opinion, the application had, in fact, failed to establish probable cause, and he dismissed the criminal complaint. 

The judge seemed to indicate that the social media posts were “protected speech” and were merely annoying rather than criminal in nature. However, the Commonwealth eventually reversed this decision and pointed out that the judge should have considered the oral testimony – and not just the application. 

Find a Qualified Criminal Defense Lawyer in Massachusetts

If you have been searching for a qualified criminal defense attorney in Massachusetts, look no further than Edward R. Molari. With our help, you can appeal various decisions by criminal courts for more favorable outcomes. Book your consultation today to get started. 

Tags: 
Criminal Defense

Rape Acquittal for Former Suffolk County District Attorney

On November 4, it was reported that Adam Foss had been acquitted of all rape and sexual abuse charges. The former Suffolk County District Attorney and criminal justice advocate is now exploring legal options to hold relevant parties accountable for making false allegations against him. His defense attorney painted a damning picture for the DA’s office in this case, accusing them of basing their entire strategy on flimsy social media evidence rather than actual proof. This story goes to show that until the defense has its day in court, it is important for everyone to reserve judgment.  

How Reliable is Social Media Evidence?

The fact that the prosecution relied on social media evidence became a major talking point in later media reports. It immediately became clear that certain social media posts – including online essays – contained allegations with no real proof behind them. Despite the obvious shortcomings of this evidence, the prosecution seems to have based almost their entire around it. 

With all that being said, social media evidence is not inherently unreliable. In fact, social media evidence can help establish a defendant’s innocence. In a rape trial, certain online messages exchanged between the defendant and the alleged victim may prove or help establish a consensual encounter. Like any other form of evidence, social media is only unreliable when it is clearly devoid of any underlying facts.

Rape Investigation Turns Up Zero Evidence of Criminal Activity

Due to the fact that these alleged crimes took place while the defendant was working at the DA’s office, an official investigation was launched into the matter. An outside law firm was called in to conduct the investigation, and the investigators found no evidence of criminal acts. Although the law firm concluded that the defendant engaged in “concerning conduct,” they stopped short of labeling his actions unlawful. This was after they interviewed almost 30 different people and searched through numerous electronic documents. 

Serious questions have been raised after these revelations. If there was clearly no evidence to suggest any wrongdoing, why did prosecutors move forward with criminal charges? What reason did they have to suspect that a legitimate crime had occurred? Were they pressured by the influence of viral social media posts and numerous netizens demanding action for an alleged crime they did not fully understand? 

As Foss’ lawyer points out, this entire debacle “undermines the principles of due process and justice.” It should come as no surprise that Foss is now considering a defamation lawsuit. 

Find a Qualified Defense Attorney in Boston

Although the prosecutors often bring forth cases with very little real evidence to back their claims, a qualified defense attorney in Boston can quickly point out the flimsy foundation on which these arguments lie. As we have seen, false accusations have the potential to destroy reputations – even when they are completely devoid of any real evidence. Every defendant deserves their day in court, and this is an important part of the criminal justice system. Contact Edward R. Molari to defend yourself in a similar manner while protecting your reputation. 

Tags: 
Criminal Defense

Assault with Intent to Murder: What Recent Boston Shooting Charges Tell Us

A shooting or a gun incident in Boston may result in a wide range of charges, and “assault with intent to murder” is only one possible example. What does this phrase mean? As with many legal terms, the definition may seem vague and uncertain to those unfamiliar with Massachusetts law. It may be especially imperative to gain an understanding of the phrase for those facing this charge, and a recent case in Boston provides important insights: 

The Definition of Assault With Intent to Murder

Armed Assault with Intent to Murder is a serious crime in Massachusetts. It involves the use of a firearm to carry out an assault, with either the goal of murdering or robbing the victim. An important aspect of this offense is intent. In order to face the consequences of this crime, the prosecution must clearly establish that the defendant intended to cause the death of the victim. This requirement presents a range of possibilities for defense strategies. 

Defendant Convicted Due to Apparent Plot to Frame Him

Although intent is an important element in trials involving assault with intent to murder, there is also a much more basic requirement: Positive identification of the defendant. If the prosecution cannot clearly establish that the defendant was, in fact, the person who carried out the crime, they are not guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. As a result, they must be acquitted. This is what one recent trial centered around in Boston. 

In September of 2023, the Superior Court wrote that a defendant was convicted of assault with intent to murder despite the fact that no one had been able to positively identify him as the shooter. The prosecution’s case rested on the testimony of one witness, who claimed to have seen the defendant about 20 minutes prior to the shooting in the same vehicle a few blocks away. 

However, the defense counsel later received an anonymous text with information about an alleged plot to frame the defendant. The text included screenshots from the witness’ social media account. In addition, the prosecution was accused of improperly questioning the defendant’s decision to plead the fifth and their decision to show the defendant a photograph of his dead friend – something that was apparently inflammatory. Finally, the prosecution was accused of misleading the jury in their closing argument. 

The defendant requested voir dire examination of key evidence, but the judge denied this. The Superior Court found this to be a mistake and subsequently vacated the defendant’s convictions. Although a new trial will proceed, this is certainly an example of a successful defense strategy. 

Where Can I Find an Experienced Defense Attorney in Boston?

If you are facing gun charges such as “assault with intent to murder,” it may be helpful to get in touch with an experienced defense attorney in Boston. Choose Edward R. Molari, book a consultation, and discuss the details of these offenses in more detail. There are many potential defense strategies for gun and shooting charges in Boston, so get in touch today to assess the most appropriate course of action. 

Tags: 
Criminal Defense

Massachusetts Judge Resigns After Facing Accusations from Anonymous Source

A judge known for his tough stance on drug crime has resigned in Massachusetts after facing accusations from an anonymous source. Judges play an important role in our society, and in many ways, our very democracy hinges on their ability to make fair, unbiased rulings. Because of their pivotal role, even the slightest allegations of wrongdoing raise alarm bells. It is not clear exactly what happened in this situation, but the sudden resignation of First Justice Douglas Darnbrough certainly leaves many questions unanswered.  

Douglas Darnbrough's Story Has Been Unraveling for Months

For many people, Darnbrough's departure from the legal world is not much of a surprise. Even casual newsreaders probably predicted such an eventuality, as the media has been asking questions about this judge for months. In October of 2023, NBC reported that Darnbrough was serving in a different county than usual after an unexplained 20-day absence. Reporters began inquiring about the situation as early as September, and they were initially informed that an "anonymous letter" had surfaced.

According to various rumors, this letter contained a certain allegation (or a number of allegations, depending on who you ask) against the judge. Apparently, this letter has been circulating around the legal world – implying that whoever wrote it knew how to distribute it in a far-reaching manner to the most important members of Massachusetts' legal community. 

Reporters struggled to find any further information, although one was apparently informed of an "open investigation" against the judge. There was also conflicting information about whether or not Darnbrough had been suspended or whether he had been placed on administrative leave. At least one team of reporters spotted the judge at his home on multiple occasions, suggesting that he was not going to work. Finally, the court claimed that Darnbrough was "on vacation." Later in October, reporters apparently spotted the judge back at work at the Plymouth District Court. Weeks later, he publicly "signaled his resignation."

What Could Have Caused this Sudden Resignation?

We can only speculate as to what caused this sudden departure. Members of Massachusetts' legal community might have more clues, as they probably saw this infamous letter and its anonymous allegations. The allegations in the letter were never vetted, so it's open to speculation as to how much truth there may be to them. As a defense lawyer, it's certainly not my business to suggest that allegations alone should be enough to establish guilt.

Work With a Defense Attorney in Massachusetts

To learn more about the latest developments in Massachusett's criminal justice world, feel free to reach out to Edward R. Molari. With many years of experience as a Boston defense attorney, Mr. Molari keeps a keen eye on the ever-evolving judicial system in the Commonwealth – giving him valuable insights as he defends various clients. 

Tags: 
Criminal Defense

Commonwealth Prosecutors Failed to Establish that Defendant Lacked a Firearms License

 It might seem obvious that in order to convict a defendant of unlawfully carrying a firearm, the prosecution would need to show the absence of a firearms license. However, one defendant in Massachusetts was convicted without the subject of a firearms license even entering into the discussion. The defendant predictably appealed the decision, and this led to an interesting debate surrounding the Second Amendment. In the end, the defendant was able to have most of his charges vacated.

The 2022 Supreme Court Decision That Changed the Outcome of This Case

In 2022, the United States Supreme Court decided that the 1911 Sullivan Act was unconstitutional. This act required New Yorkers to show a special need or “proper cause” in order to gain approval for a concealed carry license. The Supreme Court concluded that the Second Amendment supersedes this act, stating that every United States citizen should have the ability to carry a pistol in public. Arbitrary evaluations such as the “proper cause” requirement are now unconstitutional, while criminal background checks may still result in a denied application. 

So, what does this have to do with the Massachusetts case? First, a little bit of background: The defendant was found with a firearm, bullets, and a large-capacity magazine. His attorney argued that police conducted the search without a warrant, claiming that this violated the Fourth Amendment. Nevertheless, the defendant found himself facing several charges, including unlawfully carrying a firearm.  

The Burden of Proof Has Shifted

The prosecution was seemingly unaware of the Supreme Court ruling’s implications, as they did not feel that it was necessary to prove the absence of a firearm license during the trial. Prior to the Supreme Court ruling, the burden of proof was on the defendant. In other words, the defendants accused of unlawfully carrying firearms had to prove that they had a license. Today, however, the situation is completely reversed. The burden of proof now lies with the prosecution, and it is their responsibility to prove the absence of a firearm license. If they fail to do this for whatever reason, the court should presume that the defendant is innocent. 

The court did not presume the defendant’s innocence, and instead, the judge completely failed to take the Supreme Court ruling into account. He also failed to instruct the jury that in order to convict the defendant, they had to see the prosecution establish the lack of a license. 

Eventually, the highest court in the Commonwealth became aware of their mistake and vacated most of the charges made against the defendant. However, they did not vacate the charge related to the extended magazine – arguing that such a device goes beyond a simple need for personal protection. Although this clearly indicates a victory for the defendant, it is somewhat bittersweet. Although the charges were vacated, the Commonwealth remanded the case to the Supreme Court for a new trial. 

What Does This Mean for Gun Owners in Massachusetts?

It’s always a good idea to follow state laws and obtain proper licenses for your firearms. However, the Supreme Court of the United States clearly protects Second Amendment rights and gun owners on a national scale. Sometimes, the Constitution supersedes state law when it comes to gun legislation. Contact Edward R. Molari today to learn more about how you can protect your Second Amendment rights in Massachusetts. 

Tags: 
Criminal Defense
Firearms

Can a Fired Police Officer Give Reliable Testimony in a Criminal Case?

Many criminal cases in Massachusetts hinge on the testimony of police officers, but what happens when these officers are terminated or no longer employed by their department? If their testimony is necessary for prosecution, the criminal case becomes impossible to prosecute. We have seen many examples of these situations in Massachusetts over the past few years and months.  

The Massachusetts POST Commission Explained

According to the Massachusetts government, the POST Commission was created to “improve policing and enhance public confidence in law enforcement.” The commission aims to accomplish this goal by overseeing stricter regulations in terms of mandatory certification, discipline, and training for all peace officers within the Commonwealth. The acronym stands for “Peace Officer Standards and Training.”

The commission regularly releases statements and public records regarding disciplinary records. The most recent of these statements was released in September of 2023. The POST Commission’s web page allows users to:

  • View disciplinary records
  • View the statute of each peace officer
  • View decisions and orders
  • File police misconduct complaints
  • Learn about the adjudicatory process
  • Read the commission’s annual reports

What Effect Does the POST Commission Have on an Officer’s Ability to Testify?

The POST Commission can decertify police officers. In doing so, this may prevent officers from testifying in court due to the loss of their official positions. For example, the POST Commission decertified five officers in October of 2023 after they were convicted of felonies. These charges included issuing fake tickets to civilians, child exploitation, filing false reports, and others. 

In September 2016, it was confirmed that officers at the Braintree Police Department had been removing drugs, weapons, and cash from the evidence room. One officer committed suicide after their alleged involvement became clear, and numerous cases had to be dismissed as a result of the evidence going missing. Judges considered whether to vacate thousands of convictions related to the now-unreliable evidence from the Braintree Department. 

In June of 2023, a former Fall River police officer was sentenced to 18 months after a jury convicted him of beating a man and filing false reports. The fact that he has been convicted of filing one false report throws doubt upon all of his prior reports as well – and his criminal charges may, in fact, lead to more lenient sentences for defendants who were previously arrested by this fired officer. 

Where Can I Find a Qualified Criminal Defense Attorney in Massachusetts?

If you have been searching for a criminal defense attorney in Massachusetts, look no further than Edward R. Molari. A terminated police officer who cannot provide testimony is just one example of a potential situation that may work in a defendant’s favor. To learn more about defense strategies that may apply to your specific situations, book a consultation today. 

Tags: 
Criminal Defense
Criminal Procedure

The Elusive Definition of “Ghost Guns” in Massachusetts

One of the most notable buzzwords in modern American gun regulation is “ghost gun.” This is especially true with the rise of 3D printing. The problem is that many people – including responsible, legal gun owners – have no idea what this phrase actually means. It does not help that ghost gun legislation in Massachusetts is often vague and misleading, causing many gun owners to accidentally commit firearms offenses. So what exactly is a “ghost gun” in Massachusetts, and how can you avoid charges related to these weapons? 

An Example of a Ghost Gun Charge in Massachusetts

On September 25, 2023, it was reported that a suspect had been arrested with a firearm in Boston. Police were reportedly on a routine patrol when they encountered a suspect who was wanted for a recent assault with a firearm. The police then approached the individual and began a conversation. After searching the defendant, the police discovered a firearm. Upon closer inspection, the police saw that the firearm in question was a so-called “ghost gun.” They also reportedly found illegal drugs on the individual. 

As a result, the defendant was charged with unlawful possession of a firearm, unlawful possession of ammunition, possession of a firearm during a felony, and possession of class A and B drugs with intent to distribute. 

What Exactly is the Definition of a Ghost Gun in Massachusetts?

So, what exactly was this defendant caught with? An image from the police report seems to show a normal handgun. While the lower section of the handgun is made from a gray plastic material, this is not altogether abnormal in the world of modern firearms. In fact, manufacturers such as Glock sell factory-made pistols with “concrete gray” lower components. In addition, Glock and many other pistol manufacturers use plastic composites for their firearms, including nylon-based polymers. In other words, police may not find it easy to distinguish between factory-made pistols and those with 3D-printed plastic components. 

The real definition of a ghost gun involves serial numbers and not necessarily the materials or methods of construction. According to numerous sources, ghost guns are firearms that have no serial numbers or identifying marks. These are often constructed by gun owners who collect numerous parts from various sources before assembling the final firearm. 

Note that it is legal to construct your own firearm from various parts in Massachusetts – and there is no specific law against untraceable firearms in the state. However, there are a number of considerations and caveats:

  • Once you build your firearm, you must register it within seven days
  • If you are not legally permitted to own a firearm, you still cannot possess a ghost gun
  • You cannot deface or obliterate a serial number from a firearm

The last issue is the most important, as those found guilty can face between one month and two and a half years behind bars. Note that even if you knowingly receive a firearm with a defaced serial number, you can still face this charge. That said, there is no legal penalty for possessing or receiving a firearm that never had a serial number in the first place. 

Where Can I Find a Boston Defense Attorney?

If you’ve been searching for an experienced Boston criminal defense attorney, look no further than Edward R. Molari. Ghost gun legislation can be incredibly confusing for the average gun owner in Boston, and it often takes an experienced attorney to make sense of it all. Book your consultation today to discuss any potential legal consequences you might be facing as a result of so-called ghost guns.

Tags: 
Criminal Defense
Firearms

When Does Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle Lead to Criminal Charges in Massachusetts?

It is often very difficult to discern between genuine car accidents and collisions caused by negligent drivers. However, according to Massachusetts law, there is a clear line between accidents and negligence. For those who are accused of causing vehicle collisions, the difference between these two concepts could be significant. It makes sense to work with a qualified defense attorney in Boston and show that the accident was just that – an accident.  

What is “Negligent Operation of a Motor Vehicle” in Massachusetts?

Negligent operation of a motor vehicle is a criminal offense in Massachusetts. This is somewhat confusing, as “negligence” is a concept more closely aligned with civil lawsuits than criminal charges. When a defendant is successfully sued in a civil case, they are found to be “negligent,” while a defendant in a criminal case is found to be “guilty.” Perhaps a more clear word would be “reckless,” and indeed this offense is often called “reckless operation of a motor vehicle” instead. 

Negligent operation of a motor vehicle is defined according to Section 24(2)(a) of chapter 90 of Massachusetts’ General Laws:

“Whoever, upon any way or in any place to which the public has a right to access, or [in] any place to which members of the public have access as invitees or licensees, operates a motor vehicle negligently so that the lives or safety of the public might be endangered, shall be punished.”

Penalties for this offense can vary dramatically depending on factors such as speed, intoxication, and whether the defendant caused injuries or death. That being said, most courts impose a mandatory minimum sentence of two weeks in jail, with the maximum sentence being two years. There is also the possibility of fines and license suspension. 

What is the Line Between an “Accident” and Negligent Operation?

The line between an accident and criminal negligent operation is very thin in Massachusetts. This makes it exceedingly important to avoid speaking to police after the crash and while you are being investigated for this alleged offense. Even a single sentence may incriminate you under the wrong circumstances. A recent case shows that when a defendant admitted he was not familiar with a particular neighborhood, the court interpreted this as an admission of guilt and convicted him of negligent operation of a motor vehicle. It takes very little for the Commonwealth to prove that you crossed the thin line between a genuine accident and negligent operation. 

Where Can I Find an Experienced Defense Attorney in Boston?

If you have been searching for an experienced defense attorney in Boston, look no further than Edward R. Molari. We know that mistakes happen when you get behind the wheel, and it does not make sense to accept needlessly excessive criminal consequences for an accident that you never intended to cause. Book a consultation today to determine the most appropriate defense strategy based on your unique circumstances. 

Tags: 
Criminal Defense

The So-Called Canton Cover-Up: Who Really Killed Officer O’Keefe?

One of the most complex Boston murder cases in recent years is the so-called “Canton Cover-Up” – a case involving a girlfrien accused of murdering her police officer boyfriend. Despite the fact that it still has not reached trial, this case has already taken quite a few twists and turns. Its outcome will highlight the relative strengths and weaknesses of potential legal strategies in a Massachusetts murder case.  

What We Know About the Alleged Murder

Officer John O’Keefe was found dead in January of 2022. Almost immediately, his girlfriend Karen Read became a prime suspect. Police later accused her of hitting her husband with an SUV before leaving the scene. Medical examiners found no signs of an altercation but reported injuries to his right arm consistent with some kind of blunt object. In addition, they discovered multiple skull fractures. The cause of death was determined to be a combination of these injuries and hypothermia, as there had been a blizzard that night. 

The Disputed Facts

Aside from these basic facts, almost everything else about the alleged murder has been disputed. Prosecutors say that Karen’s tail light was shattered when she struck O'Keefe and that plastic fragments were recovered near his body. The defense, however, points to footage that shows Karen striking O'Keefe’s parked vehicle as she backed out of her residence after learning of his disappearance. 

The cause of the police officer’s death is also heavily debated. While the prosecution claims that this is a clear-cut case of a hit-and-run vehicular fatality, additional evidence has emerged that suggests different injuries. In particular, some have claimed that there are signs of some kind of animal attack – and possibly a beating from a weapon. 

A range of additional evidence is also heavily disputed, including cell phone data, witness statements, Karen’s alleged level of intoxication, and much more. In particular, court documents filed by the defense claim that the prosecution withheld crucial cell phone data for “more than a year.” The key piece of evidence here is Karen’s alleged Google search with the query “how long to die in the cold.” The prosecution claims that this search was made before the body was found, while the defense claims that she only typed in these words after she learned of her husband’s disappearance. The prosecution has also defended their decision not to provide certain documents, arguing that they simply were not relevant to the case. 

We can only hope that the upcoming trial answers these unresolved questions. 

Can a Criminal Defense Attorney Help With Murder Charges in Boston?

The Canton Cover-Up has highlighted various strategies that a defendant may use when accused of murder. It remains to be seen whether these strategies will prove successful, but it is certainly possible that Karen Read will walk free. If you have been accused of murder or any other violent crime, you can strive for the same goal alongside a qualified defense attorney in Boston. Choose Edward R. Molari today and book a consultation to discuss the most appropriate defense strategy. 

Tags: 
Criminal Defense
Murder
Negligent Operation of Motor Vehicle
Negligent Motor Vehicle Homicide
Motor Vehicle Manslaughter

Authorities Make Wild Assumptions About Caribbean Carnival Festival Violence

The Caribbean Carnival Festival in Boston draws thousands of visitors each year, and it provides a memorable end to the summer months with all kinds of attractions on the street. Unfortunately, these celebrations can also become violent. Recent reporting on this violence has been incredibly misleading, with both reporters and authorities jumping to wild conclusions based on questionable evidence. If you are facing false accusations of violence in Boston, a defense attorney may be the only way to clear up these confusions.  

Boston Guns – Firearms Shooting Dorchester Reports Rely on Scant Evidence

On August 28, 25 News reported that rival gangs were “staring each other down” during the Caribbean Carnival Festival in Boston. Police stated that these individuals represented an “immediate threat to the general public” and that the groups exchanged gunfire as they approached in an effort to address the situation. 

However, it should be noted that the report never actually provides conclusive statements that the gunfire was coming from these individuals. Instead, the article states that officers “heard multiple gunshots begin to ring out from the location of the group they were approaching.” Note that they are very careful to state that they did not actually see these individuals discharging firearms. Secondly, the report states that the officers “heard what they believed to be return gunfire from another location.” Again, when you examine the wording, it becomes clear that no one actually saw the individuals in question discharging their firearms. Indeed, it may very well be that these two shootings were completely independent events. 

Violence Unfairly Attributed to One Specific House in Boston

The tendency for the authorities to jump to conclusions is nothing new, and another example involves one specific house on Tiny Street. But while the story might make a good headline, there is little conclusive evidence that ties the house to gang activity. Reporters point to shell casings on the street, and cars with bullet holes parked nearby, but one of the residents at this home vehemently denies that his home is being used as a “trap house.” Instead, he accuses the reporters of fabricating stories – and he argues that it is interfering with his efforts to “get his life back together.”

If reporters were making up lies about the residences of wealthy individuals in high-income neighborhoods, they would probably be sued for defamation. 

Where Can I Find an Experienced Defense Attorney in Boston?

If you have been searching for a qualified criminal defense attorney in Boston, look no further than Edward R. Molari. Over the years, we have helped numerous defendants in the Boston area, including those accused of committing violence during street festivals. We are well aware of authorities’ tendency to jump to conclusions, and we can expose the shaky foundations that their questionable evidence is based on. Contact us today to get started with an effective defense strategy. 

Tags: 
Criminal Defense
Firearms

Pages